Skip navigation
  • 中文
  • English

DSpace CRIS

  • DSpace logo
  • Home
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
  • Explore by
    • Research Outputs
    • Researchers
    • Organizations
    • Projects
  • Communities & Collections
  • SDGs
  • Sign in
  • 中文
  • English
  1. National Taiwan Ocean University Research Hub
  2. 工學院
  3. 河海工程學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://scholars.ntou.edu.tw/handle/123456789/16513
Title: FEM versus BEM
Authors: Yunn-Shiuan Liao
Shiang-Woei Chyuan
Jeng-Tzong Chen 
Keywords: Electron devices;Capacitance;Dielectric breakdown;Voltage;Space technology;Micromechanical devices;Electrostatic analysis;Boundary element methods;Finite element methods;Capacitors
Issue Date: 18-Oct-2004
Publisher: IEEE
Journal Volume: 20
Journal Issue: 5
Start page/Pages: 25-34
Source: IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine 
Abstract: 
For the performance of electron devices, an accurate electrostatic analysis is essential, and the boundary element method (BEM) has become a better method than the domain-type finite element method (FEM) because BEM can provide a complete solution in terms of boundary values only with substantial savings in modeling effort for the variable design stage. But, for exterior problems with singularity arising from the degenerate boundary (e.g., the edge of parallel-plate capacitor), the dual BEM becomes one of the most efficacious and robust tools for simulating the fringing field near the edge of electron devices because no laborious artificial boundary technique was needed like conventional BEM. After the fringing field is known well, the charge and capacitance of electron devices can be accurately calculated, and we can also understand the minimum allowable data of dielectric strength for keeping off dielectric breakdown. Electrostatics, as used here, involves charges in motion as well as at rest. Generally, there are five fundamental quantities (voltage, charge, current, capacitance, and resistance) in electrostatics that are involved in almost all applications. For most electrical engineers, voltage, or electromotive force (EMF) is the most important one. Electrostatic problems generally play a very important role in improving the performance and reliability of electron devices in the design stage (Cheng, 1989). Although we all understand that the beginning of electrostatic theory is believed to have occurred several centuries before, the first meaningful application, the commercially electrostatic precipitator, was just installed by Cottrell in 1907. Besides two major present technologies from 1907 to now, electrostatic precipitation and electrostatic coating, Castle also suggested that there would be several new industrial applications to come from developments in the fields of micro electromechanical systems (MEMS), biotechnology, ultrafine particles, nanotechnology, and space for the future applications of electrostatics. Because electrostatics still affects the performance of MEMS and electron devices critically nowadays, how to accurately obtain the electric potential V and electric field intensity E becomes especially important for engineers. We all know that scientists and engineers usually use several techniques in solving continuum or field problems. Loosely speaking, these techniques can be classified as experimental, theoretical (or analytical), or numerical.
URI: http://scholars.ntou.edu.tw/handle/123456789/16513
ISSN: 1558-1888
DOI: 10.1109/MCD.2004.1343246
Appears in Collections:河海工程學系

Show full item record

Page view(s)

117
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Jun 30, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric

Related Items in TAIR


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Explore by
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Build with DSpace-CRIS - Extension maintained and optimized by Logo 4SCIENCE Feedback