Skip navigation
  • 中文
  • English

DSpace CRIS

  • DSpace logo
  • Home
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
  • Explore by
    • Research Outputs
    • Researchers
    • Organizations
    • Projects
  • Communities & Collections
  • SDGs
  • Sign in
  • 中文
  • English
  1. National Taiwan Ocean University Research Hub
  2. 海運暨管理學院
  3. 航運管理學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://scholars.ntou.edu.tw/handle/123456789/23421
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTaih-Cherng Lirnen_US
dc.contributor.authorHelen A. Thanopoulouen_US
dc.contributor.authorMalcolm J. Beynonen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnthony K. C. Beresforden_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-13T07:25:57Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-13T07:25:57Z-
dc.date.issued2004-02-
dc.identifier.issn1479-2931-
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholars.ntou.edu.tw/handle/123456789/23421-
dc.descriptionhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137475770_15 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100093#Abs1en_US
dc.description.abstractThe research presented in this paper applies the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to reveal and analyse transhipment port selection by global carriers. In all, 47 relevant service attributes were recorded from a literature review. Two rounds of Delphi surveys – followed by brainstorming sessions – were conducted among experts in industry and academia, in order to narrow their number to four main service attributes/criteria comprising 12 sub-criteria. An AHP designed questionnaire survey was distributed to 20 port users, which covered the total population of global ocean container operators, and to 20 transhipment service providers (port operators/authorities). The results of the AHP analysis revealed that both global container carriers and port service providers had a similar perception of the most important service attributes for transhipment port selection. However, the AHP weight ranking of the sub-criteria involved was not identical between the two surveys, providing scope for further adaptation of service providers to users' priorities. Differences in the performance ranking of six major container ports by global carriers, as revealed in the AHP survey, were then combined with the calculated weights for the 12 transhipment port selection sub-criteria to explore critical attributes where transhipment market strategy could focus.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofMaritime Economics & Logisticsen_US
dc.subjectAHPen_US
dc.subjectglobal container carriersen_US
dc.subjectport operatorsen_US
dc.subjecttranshipmenten_US
dc.subjectport marketingen_US
dc.titleAn Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection:A Global Perspectiveen_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100093-
dc.relation.journalvolume6en_US
dc.relation.pages70–91en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextno fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypejournal article-
crisitem.author.deptCollege of Maritime Science and Management-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Shipping and Transportation Management-
crisitem.author.deptNational Taiwan Ocean University,NTOU-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8889-5758-
crisitem.author.parentorgNational Taiwan Ocean University,NTOU-
crisitem.author.parentorgCollege of Maritime Science and Management-
Appears in Collections:航運管理學系
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

116
checked on Jun 30, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric

Related Items in TAIR


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Explore by
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Build with DSpace-CRIS - Extension maintained and optimized by Logo 4SCIENCE Feedback