Skip navigation
  • 中文
  • English

DSpace CRIS

  • DSpace logo
  • 首頁
  • 研究成果檢索
  • 研究人員
  • 單位
  • 計畫
  • 分類瀏覽
    • 研究成果檢索
    • 研究人員
    • 單位
    • 計畫
  • 機構典藏
  • SDGs
  • 登入
  • 中文
  • English
  1. National Taiwan Ocean University Research Hub
  2. 工學院
  3. 河海工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://scholars.ntou.edu.tw/handle/123456789/24612
標題: Effect of Finely Ground Coal Bottom Ash as Replacement for Portland Cement on the Properties of Ordinary Concrete
作者: Chuang, Chun-Wei
Chen, Tai-An 
Huang, Ran 
關鍵字: finely ground coal bottom ash;fly ash;waste;HVFA
公開日期: 2023
出版社: MDPI
卷: 13
期: 24
來源出版物: APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
摘要: 
Featured Application The COP26 UN climate conference was held from 31 October to 13 November 2021, in Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom. The Glasgow Climate Pact was the first climate deal to explicitly address the need for a reduction in unabated coal power, which is a major contributor to climate change. However, substituting coal fly ash for Portland cement is a proven effective method for carbon reduction. In Taiwan, the price of coal fly ash has risen significantly due to the implementation of coal reduction policies. This study focused on finely grinding bottom ash, a byproduct of coal combustion, for use as a substitute for Portland cement. A comparison was made between finely ground bottom ash and coal fly ash from the same power plant. Apart from workability, no discernible differences that would affect structural safety were found. Therefore, utilizing low-cost bottom ash by finely grinding it to replace Portland cement in concrete is feasible, achieving both carbon reduction and economic viability.Abstract This study investigates the use of finely ground coal bottom ash (FGCBA) as a substitute for Portland cement in concrete, comparing it with coal fly ash from the same power plant. The incorporation of this ash necessitates the addition of a superplasticizer to achieve the desired slump at the same replacement rate. The results demonstrate that at an optimal 20% replacement rate, as determined by 91-day compressive strength tests, the maximum strength achieved by FGCBA is 97.7% of the control group with pure cement, whereas coal fly ash reaches 114.0%. Drying shrinkage tests indicate for both materials have similar volume stability, while rapid chloride permeability tests show their effectiveness in reducing chloride ion permeability, with superior performance from FGCBA. Under optimal conditions, the result of the RCPT test was only 559 coulombs, which is significantly better compared to the 4108 coulombs when using fly ash from coal combustion. Our results demonstrate that utilizing low-cost bottom ash by finely grinding it to replace Portland cement in concrete is feasible, achieving both carbon reduction and economic viability.
URI: http://scholars.ntou.edu.tw/handle/123456789/24612
DOI: 10.3390/app132413212
顯示於:河海工程學系

顯示文件完整紀錄

Page view(s)

119
checked on 2025/6/30

Google ScholarTM

檢查

Altmetric

Altmetric

TAIR相關文章


在 IR 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

瀏覽
  • 機構典藏
  • 研究成果檢索
  • 研究人員
  • 單位
  • 計畫
DSpace-CRIS Software Copyright © 2002-  Duraspace   4science - Extension maintained and optimized by NTU Library Logo 4SCIENCE 回饋