Comparative analysis of methods for predicting train-induced vibrations

Abstract

Railway systems cause more severe vibration pollution than road systems, and the vibration pollution caused by railway systems has been increasing annually over the past two decades. Despite this, there is limited investigation into the accuracy of train-induced vibration prediction methods. Therefore, the present study investigated the accuracy of the detailed and general procedures proposed by the US Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for predicting train-induced vibrations. The accuracy of these methods was determined by evaluating their predictions against in-situ measurements of ground vibration levels induced by passing trains. The field experiments conducted in this study involved the measurement of train-induced vibration levels, the estimation of line-source transfer mobility (LSTM) by dropping a weight on rail sleepers, the evaluation of force density levels, and the determination of ground LSTM by dropping a weight on the ground. In addition, graphs were plotted to determine the relationships of train-induced vertical vibration levels with train speed, distance from the track centreline, and train length. The study compared measured and predicted vibration levels to assess the accuracy of the FTA's detailed and general prediction methods. Results indicate that detailed assessments tend to overestimate vibration levels, while an optimized general vibration assessment curve offers a more precise estimate. Additionally, on the basis of the measurement data, the study explored the impact of train length on ground vibration and demonstrated that track ballast can absorb vibration energy along the wave propagation path. A frequency propagation contour plot was also created to analyse vibration energy across different frequencies. These findings enhance the reliability of train-induced vibration prediction methods and provide insights for improving vibration mitigation strategies in urban railway systems.