Skip navigation
  • 中文
  • English

DSpace CRIS

  • DSpace logo
  • Home
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
  • Explore by
    • Research Outputs
    • Researchers
    • Organizations
    • Projects
  • Communities & Collections
  • SDGs
  • Sign in
  • 中文
  • English
  1. National Taiwan Ocean University Research Hub
  2. 生命科學院
  3. 生命科學暨生物科技學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://scholars.ntou.edu.tw/handle/123456789/5471
Title: A comparison of immunohistochemical and molecular methods used for analyzing the BRAF V600E gene mutation in malignant melanoma in Taiwan
Authors: Huang, Wen-Kuan
Kuo, Tseng-Tong
Wu, Chiao-En
Cheng, Hsin-Yi
Hsieh, Chia-Hsun
Hsieh, Jia-Juan
Shen, Yung-Chi
Hou, Ming-Mo
Hsu, Todd 
Chang, John Wen-Cheng
Keywords: METASTATIC MELANOMA;MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY;THYROID-CARCINOMA;FEATURES;VEMURAFENIB;PREVALENCE;EXPRESSION;CANCER;NRAS
Issue Date: Dec-2016
Publisher: WILEY
Journal Volume: 12
Journal Issue: 4
Start page/Pages: 403-408
Source: ASIA-PAC J CLIN ONCO
Abstract: 
Aims: The BRAF V600 mutation has been shown to be clinically meaningful in terms of both the prognosis and sensitivity of BRAF inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma. Recently, a BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody, VE1, was generated for the detection of tumors bearing BRAF V600E mutations. To determine the clinical value of immunohistochemical testing, we compared the prevalence of mutant BRAF detected by VE1 with direct sequencing results. Methods: Paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed melanoma biopsies were analyzed for the BRAF mutation status by immunohistochemistry with the VE1 antibody. Sanger sequencing was applied to verify the immunohistochemical results. Results: A total of 73 melanoma cases with tumor samples from primary lymph nodes and metastatic sites were selected for this study. Direct sequencing demonstrated that 18 of 73 cases (24.6%) harbored the BRAF V600 mutation: 17 with V600E and one with V600K. All 18 tumors shown to harbor the BRAF V600E/K mutations were VE1-positive. One additional case was false-positive for VE1. The sensitivity and specificity of VE1 was 100% (18/18) and 98% (54/55), respectively. The overall concordance between the immunohistochemical method and direct sequencing was excellent (98.6%). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that immunohistochemical analysis using VE1 constitutes a highly sensitive test for the detection of BRAF mutations and suggest that this cost-effective method is suitable as a rapid diagnostic approach complementary to molecular testing.
URI: http://scholars.ntou.edu.tw/handle/123456789/5471
ISSN: 1743-7555
DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12574
Appears in Collections:生命科學暨生物科技學系
03 GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Jun 27, 2023

Page view(s)

164
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Jun 30, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric

Related Items in TAIR


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Explore by
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Build with DSpace-CRIS - Extension maintained and optimized by Logo 4SCIENCE Feedback