Skip navigation
  • 中文
  • English

DSpace CRIS

  • DSpace logo
  • Home
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
  • Explore by
    • Research Outputs
    • Researchers
    • Organizations
    • Projects
  • Communities & Collections
  • SDGs
  • Sign in
  • 中文
  • English
  1. National Taiwan Ocean University Research Hub
  2. 海運暨管理學院
  3. 航運管理學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://scholars.ntou.edu.tw/handle/123456789/18990
Title: A multi-stage analysis of antecedents and consequences of knowledge management evolution
Authors: Hsiu-Fen Lin 
Keywords: Balanced scorecard;Structural equation modeling;Organizational performance;Knowledge management strategy;Knowledge management evolution
Issue Date: 4-Feb-2014
Publisher: Emerald insight
Journal Volume: 18
Journal Issue: 1
Start page/Pages: 52-74
Source: Journal of Knowledge Management
Abstract: 
Purpose
Drawing from knowledge-based view and balanced scorecard approach, this study seeks to develop an integrative model to examine the influence of two knowledge management (KM) strategies, codification KM strategy and personalization KM strategy, on the multi-stage KM evolution (KM adoption, implementation and institutionalization stages), which in turn affects balanced scorecard outcomes (financial performance, internal process performance, customer performance, and growth and learning performance).

Design/methodology/approach
Survey data from 244 managers (currently and directly in charge of KM activities) in large Taiwanese firms were collected and used to test the research model using the structural equation modeling (SEM) approach.

Findings
The results have revealed that both the codification KM strategy and personalization KM strategy are positive factors for stage-based KM evolution, but their relative importance differs across the three subsamples. Additionally, the results showed that the internal process and customer perspectives play a critical role in measuring performance during the earlier stages of KM evolution, while the financial and learning and growth perspectives emphasize the performance achievements from the latter stages.

Practical implications
Since KM implementation is an evolutionary process, using both financial and non-financial measures to assess organizational performance through KM efforts, such as the four balanced scorecard perspectives, can take full advantage of stage-based KM evolution. The results indicate that the time-lag effect is critical to distinguishing different forms of organizational performance.

Originality/value
Theoretically, this study aims to provide a research model that is capable of understanding the antecedents and consequences of staged-based KM evolution. From a managerial perspective, the findings of this study provide valuable guidelines to policy-makers and practitioners in accelerating KM evolution and achieving organizational performance.
URI: http://scholars.ntou.edu.tw/handle/123456789/18990
ISSN: 1367-3270
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2013-0278
Appears in Collections:航運管理學系

Show full item record

Page view(s)

119
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Jun 30, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric

Related Items in TAIR


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Explore by
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Build with DSpace-CRIS - Extension maintained and optimized by Logo 4SCIENCE Feedback