Skip navigation
  • 中文
  • English

DSpace CRIS

  • DSpace logo
  • Home
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
  • Explore by
    • Research Outputs
    • Researchers
    • Organizations
    • Projects
  • Communities & Collections
  • SDGs
  • Sign in
  • 中文
  • English
  1. National Taiwan Ocean University Research Hub
  2. 生命科學院
  3. 水產養殖學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://scholars.ntou.edu.tw/handle/123456789/20725
Title: Comparison of the responses of different recombinant fish type I interferons against betanodavirus infection in grouper
Authors: Kuo, Hsiang-Ping
Chung, Chia-Ling
Hung, Yu-Fang
Lai, Yu-Shen
Chiou, Pinwen P.
Lu, Ming-Wei 
Kong, Zwe-Ling 
Keywords: DICENTRARCHUS-LABRAX L.;LARVAL STRIPED JACK;NERVOUS NECROSIS;VIRUS-INFECTION;MX-GENE;PSEUDOCARANX-DENTEX;EXPRESSION ANALYSIS;ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY;IMMUNE-RESPONSE;DISEASE VIRUS
Issue Date: Feb-2016
Publisher: ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Journal Volume: 49
Start page/Pages: 143-153
Source: FISH SHELLFISH IMMUN
Abstract: 
The nervous necrosis virus (NNV) is an aquatic virus that can infect more than 30 species including the grouper, which is a valuable fish species in Taiwan. NNV causes up to 90-100% mortality in the aqua culture industry. Interferons (IFNs) are a family of cytokines that stimulate the expression of numerous proteins to protect the host against viruses and possess very unique specific characteristics in fish. The cross-reactivity of heterologous IFNs on grouper cells and larvae has not been well-studied to date. To evaluate and compare the anti-NNV effect of different fish IFNs in grouper, we successfully synthesized, subcloned, expressed and purified several fish type I IFNs in the present study: grouper (gIFN), salmon (sIFN), seabass (sbIFN) and tilapia (tpIFN). The gIFN and sIFN proteins up-regulated myxovirus resistance protein (Mx) gene expression in grouper kidney (GK) cells, but similar effects were not observed for sbIFN and tpIFN. Following co- and pre-treatment with the 4 types of IFNs with NNV infection in GK cells, sIFN exhibited the strongest antiviral ability to suppress NNV gene replication (especially at 24 h) and significantly reduced the cytopathic effect (CPE) at 72 h, followed by gIFN. Unsurprisingly, sbIFN and tpIFN had no significant effect on CPE but slightly suppressed NNV gene replication. The cytotoxicity of these four fish IFNs on GK cells was also examined for the first time. In the in vivo test, we confirmed that gIFN and sIFN had a significant protective effect against NNV when administered by intraperitoneal (IP) injection and the oral route in Malabar grouper (Epinephelus malabaricus) larvae. This study compared the protective effects of IFNs from various fish species against NNV and demonstrated crosstalk between sIFN and grouper cells for the first time. These results provide information concerning the efficacy of fish IFNs for possible therapeutic applications. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
URI: http://scholars.ntou.edu.tw/handle/123456789/20725
ISSN: 1050-4648
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.12.002
Appears in Collections:水產養殖學系
食品科學系
14 LIFE BELOW WATER

Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Jun 27, 2023

Page view(s)

213
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Jun 30, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric

Related Items in TAIR


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Explore by
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Organizations
  • Projects
Build with DSpace-CRIS - Extension maintained and optimized by Logo 4SCIENCE Feedback